×
c6reviews
Kirk and Spock interrogating a wanted man in a holding cell, behind glass
c6reviews
Star Trek Into Darkness  
a smiling, pale-skinned android with C6 tattooed to his foreheadc6reviewsHOMEABOUTUPDATESSUPPORTbluesky logo@c6reviews.
bsky.social
🔺
top

Films
home
Star Trek Into Darkness
Star Trek Into Darkness movie poster
Film number: #12
Release date: May 16, 2013
In-universe year: Kelvin 2259 (primary)
Universe Timeline Go to full timeline ➡︎
  Prime Timeline ¦ Kelvin Timeline
2233 James T. Kirk is born ¦ ❰❰ STAR TREK [2009] Nero arrives from 2387
2234   ¦   ↑       
[20 intervening years]
2255   ¦   ↑       
2256 STAR TREK
DISCOVERY (DIS)
SEASONS 1 & 2
¦   ↑       
2257 ¦   ↑       
2258 ¦ STAR TREK [2009] Spock arrives from 2387
2259 STAR TREK
STRANGE NEW WORLDS (SNW)
¦ INTO DARKNESS ↑     ↑
2260 ¦   ↑     ↑
2261 ¦   ↑     ↑
2262   ¦ BEYOND ↑     ↑
2263   ¦   ↑     ↑
2264   ¦   ↑     ↑
2265 STAR TREK
[THE ORIGINAL SERIES] (TOS)
¦   ↑     ↑
2266 ¦   ↑     ↑
2267 ¦   ↑     ↑
2268 ¦   ↑     ↑
2269   ¦   ↑     ↑
2270 THE ANIMATED SERIES (TAS) ¦   ↑     ↑
2271   ¦   ↑     ↑
[112 intervening years]
2384   ¦   ↑     ↑
2385 Rogue Synth Attack on Mars (April 5) ¦   ↑     ↑
2386   ¦   ↑     ↑
2387 Romulus Destroyed by Supernova Nero and Spock thrown back in time to 2233 and 2258
2388   ¦    
A Kelvin Timeline Starfleet Delta Star Trek Into Darkness

Star Trek Into Darkness is the twelfth Star Trek film, and it's the second of three films produced by J.J. Abrams which take place in the Kelvin Timeline.

One year after the events of the previous film, this story is about one of the Enterprise crew's greatest foes, in either timeline. After two terror attacks on Earth, Kirk goes after the man responsible, but everything is not as it seems. When he learns about seventy-two top-secret torpedoes having been loaded onto the Enterprise, the mysterious antagonist surrenders willingly, despite having the upper hand. Together, he and Kirk must uncover the true intentions of one of Starfleet's admirals.

👀 What to watch first

The Kelvin Timeline is separate from Star Trek's Prime Timeline, and these stories can be enjoyed at any point in your Trek journey without really needing any prior context. This is, however, the second film in the Kelvin trilogy, so you should definitely watch the first film, Star Trek [2009], before this one.

Additionally, this film is the Kelvin Timeline's story of the Enterprise's encounter with Khan Noonien Singh, taking many elements from the Prime Timeline's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, even though it is a completely new and different story. You may want to watch that film either before or after watching this one, just to see the parallels between the two.

Suggested Prerequisite Watch List
Series Episode Title Description / Relevance
FILM #11 Star Trek [2009] This Kelvin Timeline film comes before Into Darkness.
FILM #2 Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (Optional, watch before or after) Into Darkness takes many elements and cues from Star Trek II.
🚨 Definite spoilers beyond this point 🚨
💭 Thoughts

One-sentence summary: A megalomaniacal, warmongering Starfleet admiral enlists the help of Khan, and only the crew of the Enterprise can stop them with the cunning use of gratuitous action scenes.

Let's get one major spoiler out of the way right at the start: Benedict Cumberbatch's character is Khan Noonien Singh. His identity is not revealed until nearly 1 hour and 10 minutes into the movie, but everyone knew Cumberbatch's role before the film was even released. While Khan's appearance was not explicitly leaked, there were too many clues in previews and other media leading up to the film's release that led fans to correctly speculate on the true identity of Khan's pseudonym, “John Harrison”.

I have to admit that I had a hard time rating this one. At first, I hated it. Then I asked myself, “Is it really that bad?” Then I sort of came to the conclusion that it's not bad as a movie but it is bad as a Star Trek movie. It starts off unapologetically announcing what it intends to be, with running, jumping, yelling, a volcano, and a big dramatic shot of the Enterprise surfacing from under an alien ocean: this is going to be an action film. And that is fine with me, I understand the desire to make a feature film a little bit more digestible by the general public, as long as you stay true to the Star Trek mythos. Whether the film succeeded in the latter is debatable.

By taking many elements from the 1986 film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan – arguably the most-loved Trek film of the original six, if not of all time – this movie sets itself up for heavy criticism because, obviously, fans are going to compare it to the original... and where this film doesn't live up to its predecessor, fans will come down hard on it. Let's see, we have Khan extorting someone in order to blow up the Kelvin Memorial Archive so that Khan can steal something in a bag, but we never find out what it is. Pike dies, and Spock mind-melds with him without consent. Kirk finds out that Khan had a magic long-distance beaming device he used to get to Qo'noS, which sort of negates the need for starships. McCoy seems rather concerned about Kirk's vitals during their return to the Enterprise, but we never find out why. Maybe he was suffering from some sort of illness that was somehow supposed to explain why Kirk doesn't bat an eye at loading seventy-two mystery torpedoes onto the ship, even accepting Scotty's resignation over the issue!

Regardless of how you feel about the majority of it, the real disappointment comes in the last 12 minutes of the film (not including the credits). From the moment that Spock re-creates the iconic “KHAN!!” scream from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, it's all downhill from there. Now, personally, I didn't mind this alternate version of the events of the original film. I thought it was interesting enough, and it's an alternate timeline, after all, so it's not as if it's tromping on established canon. But after that, the film fully throws the switch from “Star Trek film” to “generic action flick”. The crash-landing of the dreadnought was gratuitous, and the hand-to-hand sequence on the moving vessels could have come from any action movie, and it actually felt silly for a Trek movie. And then, presto! Suddenly everything is reset back to the way it was at the start of the film. Everyone is alive and well, and things go on as if nothing happened. How perfectly idiotic.

McCoy and Carol Marcus inspecting a long-range torpedo on the surface of an isolated planetoid
“Have you found a decent story yet?”
“I'm trying, but all I can find are action scenes!”
🔗 References & Connections
👍👎 Pros and Cons
Benedict Cumberbatch, as Khan Noonien Singh, wearing a jacket with a high collar

👎 Demotion/Promotion Whiplash — As if Kirk being promoted from third-year cadet to captain in the previous film wasn't ridiculous enough, here he is demoted all the way back to cadet and re-promoted to first officer less than five minutes later (in elapsed movie time). Twelve minutes after that (elapsed movie time), after Pike is killed, Kirk is given back his captain's seat on the Enterprise. Phew! That has got to be the fastest and most drastic demotion/promotion cycle in Starfleet history!

🤷‍♂️ Carol Marcus underwear shot — first of all, why was she changing? She is next seen on the planetoid surface wearing the same blue uniform shirt she had on before, just with the dark-grey away team uniform layered over top. Anyway, fine, she looks great. All I'm saying is that if you're going to keep her underwear scene in, then also keep the seven seconds of Khan in the shower that you originally shot. Let's be fair, here!

👍 Villain #1 — Khan is a clear improvement of an antagonist as compared to the previous film's Nero.

👎 Villain #2 — Starfleet seems to have a long history of corrupt and awful admirals, so we can just add Marcus to the list. Someone should probably do a study on this.

👎 “Bones, what are you doing with that tribble?” — “It's a plot device, Jim. Trust me, this will be important later.” This exchange is so out of place, it literally interrupts Kirk's conversation with Khan. It feels cheap and ham-fisted.

👎👎 Deus ex Tribleustes ventricosus (god from the tribble) — not in keeping with Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, they bring Kirk back to life at the end of the film. Everything after Kirk's death in this film just happens far too quickly. Spock's “final boss battle” with Khan, Bones shoving Kirk into a cryo-tube, and then it just literally cuts to black and suddenly Kirk is alive again. Kirk was dead for less than nine minutes of elapsed movie time. This “magic reset” at the end is perhaps the most egregious part of the film. For comparison, in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, Spock died and stayed dead. Fans had to wait for the next film, released two years later, to find out if Spock would somehow return.

🗯 Nitpickery
Spock screaming with a wide-open mouth
Notable Quotes
Two people touching hands in the shape of the Vulcan salute with a glass barrier in between them
My rating: 3   FINAL SCORE
5.2
Ex Astris Scientia rating: 3  
Rotten Tomatoes “Tomatometer”: 8.4  
Normalized IMDb rating: 8.6  
Why the disparity? Remember that Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb effectively rate movies against all other films of its era, whereas ratings from Ex Astris Scientia and myself rate this film only against other Star Trek films. This is a fine film, it's just not a fine Star Trek film.  
      Cummerbund Bandersnatch
doesn't do it for me
▲ Back to Top ▲
SF Debris is an independent comedic reviewer who rates Star Trek episodes on a scale of 0 to 10. Visit his site to enjoy funny video-reviews at sfdebris.com.
click or scroll to close
Ex Astris Scientia is an independent website devoted to the Star Trek universe, and includes reviews of episodes on a scale of 0 to 10. Visit the site at ex‑astris‑scientia.org.
click or scroll to close
Professional reviewers assign a score from 0 to 10 to all movies (not just Star Trek). Visit the site at rottentomatoes.com.
click or scroll to close
User ratings on IMDb for Star Trek films range from 3.8 to 7.9. These ratings are re-distributed on a 2-9 scale. Scores of 0, 1, and 10 are reserved for outliers (determined by a z-score less than -2.5 or greater than 2.5).
click or scroll to close